Lost in the system
By Karen Auge The Denver Post
A lot of people tried to do the right thing
for Jeff. And yet, it all went very wrong.
When a neighbor saw what she thought were choke marks on his little
sister's neck, she reported it.
Adams County human services responded quickly. Investigators talked
to the children in person and away from their mother. They examined
the kids and took pictures of marks and bruises. And when they were
convinced their mother's boyfriend was hurting them, social workers
whisked Jeff and his little brother and sister off to foster homes.
In the nearly six years since, one set of foster parents was accused
of abusing Jeff, and another set rejected him. Two attorneys have
represented him, a truckload of therapists have examined, diagnosed
and treated him, and at least three caseworkers have been assigned
to him. He has been up for adoption, then not. His brother and sister
have been adopted by their grandparents; Jeff hasn't seen them in
nearly two years.
When children the system is supposed to protect die of abuse or
neglect, as happened to 13 Colorado kids last year, it gets attention
— and this year a state investigation.
Not so when they survive.
As Jeff's case illustrates, even in a system where most workers
do their best, the odds are against them — stacked by a system that
is underfunded, widely dysfunctional and inconsistent, and at times
seems to operate in a common-sense vacuum.
Two decades ago, Dr. Richard Krugman, now dean of the University
of Colorado medical school, served on a congressional advisory board
on child abuse. "That board called the child-protection system a
national emergency," Krugman said. "And nothing has changed."
Despite the odds, the system does work, frequently.
"For every tragic story you hear, there's 100 other kids who get
their needs met," said Mary McWilliams, an attorney for neglected
children.
Still, from counties where abuse and neglect suspicions are investigated,
to courts that adjudicate those cases, to the foster-care system
that is supposed to provide safe havens, Colorado's child-protection
system has one consistent theme: never enough.
There are never enough caseworkers, foster parents or adoptive parents.
Never enough dollars to treat emotionally damaged kids or provide
services to help parents in trouble keep their kids, and almost
no money for programs that prevent neglect and abuse. And there
is never enough training for anybody.
Pervasive problems
The problems encompass every aspect of the system:
• County staff members routinely handle 10 percent to 20 percent
more cases than the 12 to 15 recommended in national standards.
From 2005 to 2007 in Denver, the caseload increased 66 percent while
staff levels increased 8 percent.
• Every abused or neglected child gets an attorney, called a guardian
ad litem. In a review last year, state auditors chastised the Office
of the Child's Representative for not being more selective in choosing
attorneys. Executive director Theresa Spahn said her attorneys are
"extremely dedicated," but still, "people are not beating down my
door to come work for us at $60 an hour," the current pay rate.
• Judges who hear those cases are overwhelmed. In 2002, when Judge
Chris Melonakis took over juvenile cases in Adams County, he averaged
330 cases a year — many involving multiple children and caseworkers.
"Then, with the explosion of meth labs, that (caseload) increased
about 70 percent," he said.
• County workers try to place abused children with relatives. But
in Colorado, only certified foster parents can be paid for the care
they provide. So relatives who feed, clothe and shelter children
get virtually nothing.
• Typically, a majority of child-protection cases involve neglect,
not abuse, and neglect often stems from poverty. Yet the state computer
system that handles food stamps and other subsidies can't talk to
the child-protection computer system. Only El Paso County has found
a way to integrate the two.
• In 2005, federal Medicaid changes made it harder to provide intensive
therapy for abused children who have suffered emotional damage.
Now, residential treatment centers say government payments don't
cover expenses. The director of one treatment center says treatment
decisions are often based not on what a child needs, but what a
county can afford.
Deficiencies are no surprise
None of this should come as a surprise to either those who work
in the system or those in elected office.
In 1998, the Colorado Lawyers Council reported that "neglected and
abused children of Colorado were increasingly at risk because the
system charged with protecting them had serious deficiencies."
The state avoided a lawsuit then by agreeing to hire hundreds of
caseworkers and increase child-welfare funding.
By 2002, the state had satisfied the terms of the agreement. A year
later, besieged by plummeting revenues, the legislature began drastic
cuts to human-services budgets. Most counties have not yet recouped
the dollars lost then.
In 1999, after a Denver Post series detailing the deaths of four
children in foster care, then-Gov. Bill Owens assembled a task force
to investigate.
When that group issued its recommendations, its chairman, then-Lt.
Gov. Joe Rogers, pledged that the report "won't gather dust on some
shelf."
Eight years later, it is hard to find a copy of that report on any
shelf, anywhere.
Among other things, the report recommended creation of a state child's
ombudsman, an independent office to investigate concerns about the
child-protection system.
More than two dozen other states have such an office; in Colorado,
the proposal died in legislative committee. But this session, Rep.
Debbie Stafford has revived the idea.
In Colorado, 64 counties operate 64 separate child-welfare systems
with different practices, different services available for families
and vastly different approaches to similar problems.
The state oversees counties but has no legal leverage over them
— short of the extreme step of withholding their funding. State
human services does not regularly audit counties, but four times
in the past five years, complaints or other red flags have prompted
state investigations.
In each of the four counties, reviewers found that officials had
failed at the very essence of their mission: "to assure child safety."
In Moffat County, the state found child-protection workers didn't
go to court to force parents into programs to make children safer.
In one case, a 3-year-old suffered burns severe enough to require
skin grafts, but human-services workers closed the case after finding
no conclusive evidence of abuse.
In Crowley County, state officials found that the Sheriff's Office
was handling child-abuse complaints — and referring families to
services — because the human-services department couldn't or wouldn't
do it.
The review team concluded that the lone investigator/caseworker
and his supervisor did "not function as a child- and family-serving
agency."
And in Lake County, state officials went back a second time, in
2006, because the county had failed to fix problems uncovered two
years earlier, including that the county "did not consistently assign
a caseworker to investigate reports of child abuse or neglect."
The problems have been corrected in each county, said Sharen Ford
of the state Human Services Department.
As they await the findings of the state's current probe, children's
advocates and county officials cling to hope that this time real
changes might result.
"Karen Beye is new, the governor is new, and I believe they have
a sincere interest in seeing the system improve," said Don Cassata,
director of Adams County's Human Services Department, referring
to the executive director of the state Human Services Department.
For now, Beye won't talk publicly until the investigation is public
— probably this week.
Leafing through photo pages
In a little brick house in a northern suburb, Jeff's grandmother,
Jo Lynes, pulls out a photo album and leafs through the pages.
There's Jeff with his cousins, trick-or-treating. Jeff as a baby,
with a Buddha-belly and a red pacifier. Jeff in Wyoming with his
brother, sister and grandparents. In that photo, he sits on a wooden
horse, cowboy hat and boots on, waving an arm high over his head,
grinning.
"That face," Lynes said. "I'll never forget that face."
She has to rely on memory. Lynes is convinced she'll never see her
grandson again.
Just weeks after the photo was taken, in 2002, a neighbor called
social workers, concerned that the children were being abused.
Colorado parents abuse and neglect their children at a rate worse
than parents in all but 10 other states, according to the Child
Welfare League of America.
Last year Colorado residents made 70,216 calls to report abuse and
neglect.
This fiscal year, the state will spend $409 million on child welfare
— of which 26.7 percent is federal money, 25 percent is county funding
and 47.5 percent is from the state's general fund.
In each of the past six years, nearly all Colorado counties have
spent more on child protection than the state gave them. To make
up the deficit, counties have raided other pots of social-services
money.
So while calls to child-abuse hotlines have soared — from 42,559
in 2001 to 72,016 last year — most counties haven't been able to
hire more staff.
After years of struggling, the director of human services in Colorado's
most populous county has finally obtained additional state money.
"We worked with the state to get El Paso County's allocation up
there comparable to the size county that we are," Barbara Drake
said.
El Paso County expects to bolster its human services staff, which
includes child welfare, by 17 this summer and seven more later.
Likewise, Denver County, which has not regained all the staff it
lost in 2003 cuts, hopes to add 40 full-time employees to its child-welfare
staff of 263.
Getting the money was hard; filling the jobs won't be easy. In March,
Denver advertised an opening for a therapist for abused or neglected
kids. Candidates must have a master's degree, be a licensed social
worker and be willing to work late nights, weekends and holidays.
Starting salary: $42,153.
At the same time, Denver also sought a solid-waste supervisor. Requirements:
high school diploma, or the equivalent, and three years' experience
in garbage collection.
Starting salary: $43,996.
Low pay, stress and high caseloads all partly explain why annual
turnover among child-welfare caseworkers generally hovers between
30 percent and 40 percent nationwide.
From engaging to enraged
When Jeff was 4, a Head Start teacher described him as a happy,
bright, engaging little boy.
By the time he was 7, more than one therapist saw in him a child
with post-traumatic stress disorder, a child frightened and insecure,
and angry.
They saw a child who had been severely abused, in his mother's home.
Taking him, and his brother and sister, away from that home was
supposed to make it better.
Caseworkers try to find foster families near kids' own neighborhoods,
so they don't have to leave schools and friends. But foster parents
are in such short supply that county workers often can't be choosy
about geography.
And so, on a July night in 2002, Jeff and his brother were taken
to a home 50 miles away. His sister went to a different home.
Mary McWilliams, who has been a guardian ad litem for six years,
said recently that if she could wave a magic wand and change anything
in the system, she would not ask for more caseworkers or better
pay.
"It would be more quality foster homes," she said. She has represented
Jeff since 2003; she declined to talk about his case.
Three times during the nearly nine months the boys lived in a Castle
Rock foster home, police and social workers were called because
someone suspected they were being abused — again. Not once during
those nine months is there any record that Jeff's caseworker visited
him in that home.
His first attorney, Merna Thane, became so frustrated that she wrote
an angry letter to a judge: "These children have not received the
services they should have in a timely fashion, or follow-up on issues
did not occur."
She went on to describe "an astounding lack of communication between
the . . . caseworker and nearly all other workers and professionals
on this case."
The suspicions of abuse were never substantiated. No charges were
ever brought.
When she took over the case, McWilliams and others insisted the
boys be moved. Three years later, that foster mother, Tember Rector,
was convicted of seriously injuring a 2-year-old boy in her care.
She is free pending appeal.
Whatever happened to Jeff, therapists' notes make it clear that
his fears, his trauma and his anger did not dissipate during his
stay there.
If anything, they increased.
He was too much for one set of foster parents to handle, and prone
to "explosive and aggressive behavior."
One therapist noted that "the only thing that could have made (his)
already poor attachment issues worse was the moving from family
to family, as it reinforces his idea that he is not worthy of family
life."
The keys to helping kids recover from trauma are providing them
with security and relationships they can trust, said Skip Barber,
director of the Colorado Association of Family and Children's Agencies.
Both can be hard to come by in the child-protection system.
State has areas of excellence
Despite its problems, Colorado's system has pockets of excellence.
Melonakis has been nationally recognized for innovative practices
that move cases efficiently and provide greater accountability.
In El Paso County, teaming welfare and child-protection workers
has proved instrumental in helping resolve neglect issues and preventing
them from escalating into physical abuse.
The Mental Health Center Serving Boulder and Broomfield Counties
next month will receive a national award for a program to treat
abused children.
In 2005, Jeff's photo went up on the Adoption Exchange website.
The posting described him as "an exceptional boy who has many interests."
In addition, it said, he "has siblings with whom he needs to remain
in contact."
He has not been adopted, and his picture is no longer on the website.
Jo and Ron Lynes acknowledge that their daughter "makes bad choices
in men." But they assert that most of their grandson's battering
happened in foster care. That position, they realize, hurt their
efforts to get custody of Jeff.
In her worst moments, Jo Lynes worries that Jeff's future will bring
him only more pain.
"He'll end up one of the statistics," she said, wiping her eyes.
"He'll end up in juvenile hall."
He wouldn't be the first kid to bounce through foster care only
to find trouble on the other side. In 2001, a National Institute
of Justice study found that being abused or neglected as a child
increased the likelihood of arrest as a juvenile by 59 percent and
increased the chances of being involved in crime as an adult by
28 percent.
Wherever he is, Lynes wants Jeff to know that his little brother
and sister still ask for him, still miss him, still love him.
At school recently, his sister was assigned to write a story. She
wrote of coming home one afternoon and finding a package on the
porch, addressed to her. It is from her big brother. Inside are
directions — like a scavenger hunt — for finding a surprise he has
hidden for her.
She follows the directions and finds a magic unicorn. She writes
her brother a letter, thanking him, and promising to use the unicorn
for only good, "not for anything bad, like to rob a bank."
In the fantasy story, Jeff writes back: "I guess I knew you could
use some magic."
So could he, Lynes said.
Karen Auge: 303-954-1733 or kauge@denverpost.com
BACK TO TOP
|
|